Judge shoots down the vaccination “choice” movement!

LAWYERS WHO FILED A REQUEST TO STOP THE ENFORCEMENT OF SB 277 WERE SHOT DOWN BY THREE SUPREME COURT RULINGS!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net  is acknowledged.

 

Supreme Court SealSenate Bill 277 was passed and signed into ‘law’ by Governor Brown last year. This so-called law prevents parents from opting out of California’s vaccination requirements for children entering public or private schools.  Essentially no child can be enrolled without proof that they have been subjected to a litany of unwarranted pharmaceutical products called vaccines.

Before the passage of SB 277 parents could submit a document or form requesting permission to opt out (get an exemption) with the assurance that this permission would be granted. This process has been relied on by California vaccine-savy parents for many years, allowing them to ignore the fact that the ‘state’ had no authority to force them to have their progeny injected with any substance whatsoever. The privilege (the Judge’s words not mine) of opting out created what is referred to as the vaccine “choice” movement, i.e. the parent could chose to vaccinate or not!

Well, on August 26, 2016 Judge Dana Sabraw of the UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA filed a motion in the court denying the request of a group of attorneys (on behalf of multiple people and institutions) to stop the implementation of SB 277. The attorneys had sited several reasons to halt the application of SB 277 including ‘Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion’.

Some of us were expecting this response for the very same reasons the Judge cited, the main one being case law that was established by the 1944 Supreme Court decision Prince vs. Massachusetts. Judge Sabraw not only cited the Prince case, he sited two others as well: Jacobson vs the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1905) and Zucht vs. King (1922). None of these three cases has been overturned mainly because the Supremes have refused to hear suits challenging them, which is their prerogative in our current injustice system. In fact, the Rutherford Institute filed a petition to challenge mandatory vaccines in 2011 and the Supremes rejected it.

Here is Judge Sabraw’s official conclusion: Continue reading

Calling the shots: State forces parents to sign vaccine docs

STINGING FIGHT ERUPTS OVER NEW ‘ATTEMPTS’ TO INVADE FAMILIES PRIVACY!

By Bob Unruh, WND.com
August 21, 2016

[Comments from the PAMV editor:  Ahhh! The ongoing battle between the statutory code writers and the administrative code enforcers! Question: are the administrative code enforcers merely meeting their obligations to a federal grant contract ($$$) that the statutory code writers are unaware of? If you read the fine print in Clinton’s Ex Or 13132 on “Federalism” it becomes a distinct possibility.]

vaccine injectionA fight has erupted over a decision by bureaucrats in Colorado to go, according to critics, well beyond what the law allows and threaten parents of homeschoolers seeking exemptions from state vaccinations requirements for their children.

There was a plan before the legislature earlier this year that would have demanded homeschool parents sign forms stating things like, “My child may be at increased risk of developing …” and “Failure to follow the advice of a physician … who has recommended vaccines may endanger my child’s/my health or life and others who come into contact with my child/me.”

Officials with the Home School Legal Defense Association said they helped defeat the “attempts to invade families’ privacy.”

The proposal didn’t give parents the option – it simply demanded they make that particular political statement.

But, the HSLDA explains, demanding that parents “affirm that by exempting their child from immunizations they are endangering the life and health of that child … is at odds with some parents’ personal and/or religion beliefs.”

“By forcing parents to make this statement, the state of Colorado is unconstitutionally compelling speech.”

The issue now is that although lawmakers rejected the idea, “overzealous state officials are back at it – this time with an unconstitutional form which may force parents to violate their conscience in order to obtain immunization exemptions for their children.”

A new report explained the form was created in June by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment and “is mandatory for anyone seeking a non-medical exemption from state immunization requirements. Persons who sign the form in order to obtain an exemption are required to affirm a number of statements which may go against their personal and religious beliefs,” HSLDA reported.

Continue reading

Doctor offers vaccination contract to parent of sick child!

CONTRACTS SIGNED UNDER DURESS OR COERCION ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE – UNLESS THEY CONTAIN NO EVIDENCE OF EITHER THREAT OR COERCION!

Earlier this year a relatively ill advised physician in California permitted his office personnel to administer a nasty little contract agreement to his new patients, that is if he even knew about the paper work they were handing out to all new patients.  Many times physicians foolishly allow business managers to process whatever paperwork they feel appropriate and are completely in the dark.

Excerpts from an article found on jeffereyjaxen.com/blog titled Doctor’s Refusing Care Unless Patients Sign “Immunization Contract” Forcing Full Schedule of Shots

It was a day like any other at the Carmichael, California practice of Matthew T. Cohan, MD. A father entered the waiting room with his daughter by his side. The daughter — a new patient — was experiencing upper respiratory congestion. Before she could be seen, standard new patient paperwork needed to be filled out. However, on the final page of this paperwork, the office required new documentation to be complete before the patient could be seen.

Here is Dr. Cohan’s Immunization Contract:

Immunization Contract

As the father was seeking medical attention for his sick daughter, it is unlikely the physician would have vaccinated the girl during that visit anyway. However, by demanding this agreement be signed PRIOR to the child seeing the doctor, it could easily be seen as a denial of care.  Unfortunately there is no indication on the contract that the child was even ill.

So, why would a pediatrician deny care to a child whose parent prefers not to vaccinate per the CDC schedule, outside of the fact he is grossly ignorant of the nature of the CDC itself?

Was it the carrot or the stick?

In the case of this physician it could be BOTH the carrot and the stick. Continue reading

We cannot let the STATE inoculate our children without our knowledge or consent!

. . . WHICH GOVERNOR BROWN AUTHORIZED IN CALIFORNIA BY SIGNING AB499 IN 2011!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net  is acknowledged.

gardasil vialThe passage of Assembly Bill 499 in California should have been a wake up call for all parents. It essentially eliminated the parent’s authority when it comes to the administration of some vaccines. It grants the STATE (school) permission to vaccinate 12 year old boys and girls with the dangerous HPV vaccine without their moms and dads knowledge or consent.

While there will be some activists who continue to beat the freedom of religion and parental rights drums, these arguments were defeated way back in 1944 with the Supreme Court decision Prince vs Massachusetts and the doctrine of Parens Patriae. The Center for Disease Control knows this and posts it on their web site. (Chapter 13, page 273)

”Neither rights of religion nor rights of parenthood are beyond limitation. Acting to guard the general interest in youth’s well being, the state as parens patriae may restrict the parent’s control by requiring school attendance, regulating or prohibiting the child’s labor, and in many other ways. Its authority is not nullified merely because the parent grounds his claim to control the child’s course of conduct on religion or conscience.

Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious  grounds. The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death. (321 U.S. at 166–7, 64 S.Ct. at 442)”

I have no idea why the vaccine-aware non-profits and vaccine rights attorneys ignore Prince vs. Massachusetts! Are they intentionally misleading the public?

As it is likely that other states will go down the same path as California due to the Healthy People 2020 program of the UNITED STATES’ (federal corporation – see Title 28 US Code, section 3002) Department of Health and Human Services, this action in California should inspire all parents to think about who should decide if their children receive inoculations, i.e. who owns our children . . . legally?

There is no way to answer that question from inside the Matrix that we have been stuck in our entire lives. Those unwilling to face our Matrix reality are dooming themselves and their sons and daughters to much heartache and suffering because the vaccination agenda is not going away anytime soon, as Dr. Sheri Tenpenny explained eloquently on Red Ice Radio.

So dear Matrix people, will it be the blue pill or the red pill?

Continue reading

Former NBC boss asserts his grandson damaged by vaccines

Former NBC boss asserts his grandson damaged by vaccines

bob wright

By Jon Rappoport, nomorefakenews.com
April 20, 2016

The roof is beginning to cave in on the vaccine empire.

Now, in the wake of the unsuccessful attempt to censor the film Vaxxed (trailer), we have Bob Wright, the former CEO of media giant, NBC Universal, authoring a new book, “The Wright Stuff: From NBC to Autism Speaks.”

In its review of the book, Accuracy in Media provides a devastating quote from Wright about his autistic grandson:

“Right after he got the standard one-year vaccinations, he developed a very high fever and screamed for hours. Katie [Wright’s daughter] was so frightened she called her husband to come home from work and they put the baby in an ice bath to bring down the fever. When they called the doctor they were told the reaction was completely normal.”

Yes, completely normal in the eyes of a lunatic licensed to practice medicine.

Normal, if brain damage is something parents should be expected to shrug off.

Normal, if destroying the life of a child, through officially sanctioned means, is simply written off as the cost of doing pharmaceutical business.

Wright goes on to say that he tried, without a shred of success, to convince Bush and Obama they needed to improve vaccine safety. According to Wright, the Bush people feared negative press reaction, and Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett killed the idea.

In the past few days, a long-time blogger for Huffington Post, Lance Simmens (twitter), submitted a positive review of Vaxxed. It was posted, then deleted—and Simmens’ account at Huff Po was canceled without notice. More censorship. The geniuses at Huff Po haven’t gotten the memo yet: blacking out information about the film only gives it more legs. Do they even have a press operation over there? I always assumed Huff Po was built as a façade/cardboard box, in order to sell it. That objective was achieved in 2010, when AOL gobbled it up for $315 million. What an extraordinary hustle.

Huff Po can’t even stomach allowing a positive review of Vaxxed to see the light of day. I wonder how they feel about vaccines causing brain damage—I mean the actual occurrence of it. Perhaps they don’t care. Perhaps they’re so far removed from the truth they don’t even think about it. But I’m willing to bet at least a few people on the payroll know the reality of it, and under the surface they’re boiling.

The CDC has large numbers of vaccine scandals buried in their files. One of them involves a vast over-exaggeration of flu deaths in the US every year. As researcher Peter Doshi noted, years ago, the old canned figure for annual flu deaths, 36,000, was a gross exaggeration. One year, the actual number of confirmed flu deaths in America—where the flu virus was positively identified—was, wait for it: 18. Of course, the CDC uses those flu-death stats to convince Americans they must take the flu vaccine.

Original article

Related

CDC Exposed

The BAR cannot stop forced vaccinations – but we can!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net  is acknowledged.

While many good men and women have become BAR attorneys, they are limited in what they can and cannot do . . . without losing their BAR cards.  For instance, they cannot admit or acknowledge the following realities:

So, it falls upon the people to seek their own methodology – outside of the BAR box – for refusing vaccination mandates or requirements.  This video explains the reasons we can and MUST break away from BAR restrictions and forge our own strategies.

Related

The Vaccination Notice

 

Vaccine Pushers and Beneficiaries

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

CDC INCThe following is unknown by most health practitioners
and is denied by most attorneys!

FOUR INDISPUTABLE FACTS REGARDING THE VACCINATION PROGRAM:

1) VACCINES CAUSE ILLNESS AND INJURIES AND NEITHER THE PUBLIC NOR HEALTH PRACTITIONERS HAVE BEEN TOLD THE TRUTH BY CDC INC!
In March 2011 an investigation by scientists exposed that the ‘UK government’ had been covering up the harmful effects of vaccines for the past 30 YEARS. Their study, “Health Hazards of Disease Prevention” was presented to the British Society for Ecological Medicine. It exposed that the UK ‘government’ ” . . . made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations from both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence . . .” The same is true in the UNITED STATES.

* More info about the damaging health effects of vaccines at: International Medical Council on Vaccination

2) THE VACCINE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUITS
In 1986 vaccine manufactures and administers were given immunity from liability with the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act! And, the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System was established. Annually, it reports about 11,000 serious vaccine reactions, including up to 200 deaths and many more permanent disabilities. But, poor reporting in America suggests that annual adverse vaccine reactions, in fact, number from 100,000 – one million.

Then to ‘seal the deal’, the US Supreme Court decided in 2011 (Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) to grant big pharma immunity from liability even if their products were knowingly contaminated.

Continue reading

Be wary of BAR gatekeepers

. . . THEY ARE EVERYWHERE!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

gatekeeper

Following is an analysis of some of the opinions expressed by BAR attorney Alan Phillips on December 22, 2015 in an invitation-only internet vaccination discussion forum with a large membership (over 100 members). Mr. Phillips expressed his opinion as to what topics the members of this discussion forum should be allowed to post and what they should not be allowed to post. Unfortunately the moderator of this discussion forum decided to accept Phillips’ definitions. I was removed for posting a piece exposing that physicians are being called upon to report on patient’s public health status (which would include vaccination history) called Deputizing Doctors

My primary concern is not my removal from the discussion forum, but the extremely important information that is being censored by the influence of  gatekeeper BAR attorney Phillips. By controlling the discussion, Phillips can ensure the elephants in the room are never acknowledged or explored. The physicians, non-profit directors, researchers and journalists in the forum are then kept in the dark as to the vaccination agenda and how it is being executed across the country. Without this knowledge, they will be powerless to help stop it.

Please note: Alan Phillips has claimed to be the leading legal expert in the country regarding vaccines and ‘the law’. Many do not concur with his self assessment. Below are a few of gate keeper Phillips comments followed by my analysis  – which includes bona fide sources.

****************************

 Alliance for Vaccine Awareness [invitation only internet discussion forum]

Disinformation: Critical Scrutiny is Necessary
Posted by Alan Phillips Tuesday at 1:52pm [December 22, 2015]

Excerpts:

There are only 2 legitimate vaccine discussion areas: 1) medical (do they work, are they effective, are they necessary, are there viable alternatives, etc.), and 2) legal (when are they mandatory, do you have the right to refuse, how do we change laws to get those rights, etc.). Issues of corruption, politics, etc. fall under these two headings–the use of false science to control policy and law, our rights.

When we allow our focus to be pulled away from these topics, big pharma pushes forward with its legislative agenda unopposed. WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE ROAD IS IN THE STATE LEGISLATURES, as the fed govt lacks authority to mandate vaccines directly. There are definitely fed law issues, but the primary focus must be on the state law level.

But I respectfully request that the owner or manager of this . . . project delete any discussions not pertinent to vaccine medicine and law, . . .


Let’s look at the important issues outside of gatekeeper Phillips’ definitions: vaccine science and state statutory law.

Continue reading

30 Solid Scientific Studies that Prove Vaccines [can] Cause Autism

Sean Adl-Tabatabai, yournewswire.com
December 9, 2015

mmr - vial

We have compiled a list of 30 scientific studies that show a link between vaccines and autism, disproving the myth that no official research papers exist to support what alternative doctors have been saying for years. 

These papers can be shown to medical doctors and public health officials who wish to see peer reviewed scientific studies to back up the claims that autism is a direct result from receiving a vaccination.

The first research paper presented was the first one ever written on the subject, from 1943.  Child Psychiatrist Leo Kanner discovered 11 children over the course of several years who displayed a novel set of neurological symptoms that had never been described in the medical literature, where children were withdrawn, uncommunicative and displayed similar odd behaviors. This disorder would become known as “autism.” In the paper, Dr. Kanner noted that onset of the disorder began following the administration of a small pox vaccine. This paper, was published in 1943, and evidence that vaccination causes an ever increasing rate of neurological and immunological regressions, including autism, has been mounting from that time until now.

Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact
Leo Kanner, Johns Hopkins University, 1943

“Since 1938, there have come to our attention a number of children whose condition differs so markedly and uniquely from anything reported so far, that each case merits – and, I hope, will eventually receive – at detailed consideration of its fascinating peculiarities.”

All of Kanners cases were born after, and began to appear following, the introduction of Eli Lilly’s new form of water soluble mercury in the late 1920s used as an anti-fungal in forestry, a wood treatment product in the lumber industry and as a disinfectant and anti-bacterial in the medical industry under the name of “Thimerosal” that was included in vaccines.

As I testified to at the hearing, there is abundant research supporting the vaccine autism link. I have included 49 research papers for your review, and only included research published in the last ten years or so. This is by no means a complete list, but it one that I have been compiling for the last few years as relevant research came to my attention. I have ONLY included autism related information, not research on other vaccine injuries of which there are many.

As you can see, the medical professionals testifying that there is no scientific support for the vaccine/autism causation theory are uninformed about the current state of the science. When vaccination decisions are made based on an uninformed opinion, it means serious potential damage to the patient, and because of the law preventing lawsuits for vaccine injury, it also means that the uninformed medical professionals making bad recommendations CANNOT be held accountable in any way for giving the patient bad information.

Parents want to know if their child can develop autism from their vaccines. If they believe that the answer is yes, and the risk of brain injury from vaccination is higher than their risk from a disease, it is their right to decline vaccination for themselves and their children with out coercion.

Patients MUST be able to make their own informed vaccine decisions, because often, they know more about potential vaccine risks that even top public health officials do.

1. Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism
Annals of Epidemiology, September 2009
CM Gallagher, MS Goodman, Stony Brook University Medical Center

Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life.

Continue reading

Caution: unHealthy People 2020 is coming after us all!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and AntiCorruption Society is acknowledged.

[Originally posted on AntiCorruption Society.com]

un healthy peopleThe mandatory vaccination issue is ramping up and according to Dr Gary G Kohls, MD there are 271 new vaccines in Big Pharma’s pipeline. Since Big Pharma and the vaccine pushers and promoters have a “liability exemption”, their business plan represents pure profit and no loss for all of those involved.

According to the excellent research of Dr Sherri Tenpenny, the Department of Health and Human Services launched a program in 2010 called Healthy People 2020. Their goal is to remove all (but medical) school vaccine exemptions and push vaccinations in every arena of our society. Thanks to Executive Order 13335 of Bush Jr (which implemented electronic medical records across the country), tracking our vaccination history will be easy for government-corporations and medical institutions alike.

Those who understand the very real threat to our health that vaccines represent, have every right to be concerned and downright outraged. In fact, if they are not they don’t really understand what is going on. Those who still think there is a legislative solution to vaccine mania need to listen to Tenpenny’s entire interview on Red Ice Radio. Healthy People 2020 is an extremely well funded top-down program.

As Healthy People 2020 rolls out, the only way left for us to protect ourselves and our progeny from toxic vaccines is to get smart about what our so-called government has morphed into and challenge its nonexistent authority.

On In Defense of Humanity last Saturday, we featured a clip of Dr Sherri Tenpenny’s exposé regarding the Healthy People 2020 program. We also played clips of a 2011 interview with the fabulous historical and legal researcher (may she rest in peace) Joyce Rosenwald. Joyce explains the many ways both our history and our legal system have been misrepresented to us and how we are unwittingly consenting to rules (laws) that lack lawful authority.

Please listen to the In Defense of Humanity show of Aug 19, 2015 so you can start to understand that there are lawful ways to refuse to cooperate with the ever-growing vaccination agenda.

Quote from The UCC and You:

Page 39
A person created under de jure law, with the person’s identifying name appearing as prescribed by law and according to the rules of English grammar, is a legal fact. A corrupted “alter ego” version of that name [the STRAWMAN], manufactured under the legal fiction of “right of presumption”, will have credibility only so long as the presumption remains unchallenged. The rule of the world is that anything and everything skates unless you bust it.

In other words, if you consent . . . you can’t complain! Let them know you don’t consent by presenting them with a Vaccination Notice.

Related

Joyce Rosenwald interview on My Private Audio

Parens Patriae – Government as Parent by Joyce Rosenwald

Treason – A Notice to Public Servants by Joyce Rosenwald

Time for the BAR to stand down!

ABA - NOWHEN BAR ATTORNEYS CRAFT LEGISLATION DESIGNED TO TRICK HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PARENTS INTO HAVING THEIR SONS AND DAUGHTERS INJECTED WITH TOXIC VACCINES, THEY ARE COMMITTING A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

“Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroys information and religions destroy spirituality” is a quotation that has been credited to medical hypnosis expert Michael Ellner.

  • Doctors are falsely taught that vaccines are good
  • Dentists are falsely taught that fluoride is beneficial
  • Professors are falsely taught that oil comes from dead dinosaurs
  • Lawyers are falsely taught that we have a legitimate government and legal system

Just because someone went to law school and holds a BAR card, does not mean they are experts in the law. Did you know there is a difference between what is “legal” and what is “lawful”? In fact, having a BAR card generally means its holder has been trained in the implementation of a deceptive and corrupt system. Here is what former World Bank attorney Karen Hudes said about the BAR: (2 min)

Recently a BAR attorney was a guest on an internet radio show, whereas he voiced his misleading opinion regarding the STATE OF CALIFORNIA’s new public health law SB 277, banning all exemptions for day care and school vaccination requirements but medical ones.  Those who heard him and follow his recommendations will unnecessarily be inflicting vaccinations on thousands (if not more) of innocent children. While there will likely be other BAR “Esquires” who agree with his opinion, his misleading statements MUST be challenged/corrected.

The BAR attorney explained that state statutes consist of terms that are legal in nature (not what most of us would understand) and terms that are commonly recognized in our dictionaries. On this point he was absolutely correct, which is why all of my consultants own legal dictionaries and know where to locate the most commonly used definitions in each state’s statutory codes.

Here is an audio clip from his interview:

He discussed what he thought was meant by the term “governing authority”, but passed over the most important term in the first sentence of the SB 277, which is “person as a pupil”. The BAR attorney falsely left the impression that this term meant the sons and daughters of California mothers and fathers. Continue reading

Who owns our children?

IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT BAR ATTORNEYS TELL YOU –  THAT THE STATE HAS A LAWFUL CLAIM TO CONTROL YOUR CHILDREN’S HEALTH CARE  –  READ NO FURTHER.

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

If you believe the constitution is going to protect your children from mandatory school vaccinations then please review this Federal Judge’s decision.  See Judge tosses out three religious exemption claims

familyWhy are we asking the STATE OF corporation their permission (an exemption) to protect our precious children from unwarranted toxic pharmaceutical products known as vaccines?

Who owns our children?

When a man and woman combine their biological matter together to create a zygote, they are the rightful owners of their creation. Without her biological matter (egg) and his biological matter (sperm) the zygote would not exist. The woman’s body provides the environment necessary for the zygote to grow into maturity. Upon maturity, the woman’s body provides the process necessary for the zygote to join our world as a brand new male or female. The fledgling boy or girl needs many years of nurturing before reaching his/her maturity i.e. ability to care for himself/herself. The man and woman own and are obliged to care for their progeny (property) until their progeny reaches adulthood. The vast majority of male and female progeny reach adulthood as a result of their mother and father’s care and nurturing.

The STATE OF corporation (owning no eggs, sperms or wombs) contributes nothing to this process and therefore cannot make any lawful claims as “Parens Patriae“.

So how is it that they claim to have the authority to force mothers and/or fathers to enter their progeny into public schools (compulsory education) or force them to inject their progeny with toxic unwarranted pharmaceutical products called vaccines? What authority does the STATE OF’s child protective services (CPS) have to steal the mother and father’s property (progeny)? Since the STATE OF didn’t (couldn’t) contribute to the creation of the man and woman’s progeny (boy or girl), where does its ownership claim come from? What does the STATE OF corporation actually own?

Continue reading