WARNING: THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS CRITICAL TO ALL PARENTS AND IS ALSO SOMETHING LAWYERS WILL NEVER ADMIT TO! IN FACT MOST LAWYERS SUPPORT THE CONCEPT THAT THE STATE OWNS OUR CHILDREN.
By AL Whitney © copyround 2017
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net is acknowledged.
Many parents are already aware of the “Medical Kidnapping” of children that has been going on for quite awhile in the United States. Others – the compliant ones – are oblivious to this state executed crime.
Since the passage of the Social Security Act in 1935 and the implementation of state issued Birth Certificates, the state has assumed the unconstitutional supreme authority over all children who have a Birth Certificate. The doctrine behind this usurpation of authority is known as Parens Patriae.
Parens patriae definition from legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com:
In the United States, the parens patriae doctrine has had its greatest application in the treatment of children, mentally ill persons, and other individuals who are legally incompetent to manage their affairs. The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state.
Under most religious law, the children belong to the parents. It is a moral obligation on the part of the parents to care for and educate their children in their existing social values and morals. However, the Center for Disease Control INC (CDC) has informed its employees that this is not really the case. The following comes from their web site:
From CDC Chapter 13 (pg 273)
Vaccination Mandates: The Public Health Imperative and Individual Rights
KEVIN M. MALONE AND ALAN R. HINMAN
LEGAL AUTHORITIES—CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF MANDATORY VACCINATION
Further authority to compel vaccination of children comes under the doctrine of parens patriae in which the state asserts authority over child welfare. In the 1944 case of Prince v. Massachusetts, which involved child labor under an asserted right of religious freedom, the U.S. Supreme Court summarized the doctrine, noting that:”Neither rights of religion nor rights of parenthood are beyond limitation. Acting to guard the general interest in youth’s well being, the state as parens patriae may restrict the parent’s control by requiring school attendance, regulating or prohibiting the child’s labor, and in many other ways. Its authority is not nullified merely because the parent grounds his claim to control the child’s course of conduct on religion or conscience.
Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious grounds. The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death. (321 U.S. at 166–7, 64 S.Ct. at 442)”
The State functions under the presumption that when the parent signed the Certificate of Live Birth, thus registering their newborn, consent was given for the State to assume the role of Parens Patriae. From the Certificate of Live Birth the State issues a Birth Certificate with the baby’s name on it. The state owns the Birth Certificate, which it created, not the baby, which it did not create.
Definition of certificate:
A document (such as a birth certificate) prepared by an official during the course of his or her regular duties, and which may be used as evidence for certain purposes.
Unless parents rebut the presumption that they volunteered to place their infant into the authority of the state, the state will maintain its presumed position. Thus, the state – and their courts – can kidnap children at will. Unfortunately, few parents are aware of this duplicitous system so they neglect to insure their right of ownership by signing “Without Prejudice” above their signature on the Certificate of Live Birth.
“Without Prejudice” is a legal reservation of rights per UCC 1-308.
The easiest way to correct the record, for those who signed without adding the “Without Prejudice” notation, is to amend the original agreement ASAP via a Notice of Condition Precedent. The Notice contains the following statement:
Let it be known to all that this notice also serves to amend my son’s Certificate of Live Birth and rebut any presumption that I have granted the State parental authority (parens patriae doctrine) over my son, Jimmy John Doe (date of birth: 5-7-09).
Understanding and processing a Notice of Condition Precedent is not difficult nor expensive. Here are more details: Notice of Condition Precedent