The following is unknown by most health practitioners and is denied by most attorneys!
FOUR INDISPUTABLE FACTS REGARDING THE VACCINATION PROGRAM:
1) VACCINES CAUSE ILLNESS AND INJURIES AND NEITHER THE PUBLIC NOR HEALTH PRACTITIONERS HAVE BEEN TOLD THE TRUTH BY CDC INC!
In March 2011 an investigation by scientists exposed that the ‘UK government’ had been covering up the harmful effects of vaccines for the past 30 YEARS. Their study, “Health Hazards of Disease Prevention” was presented to the British Society for Ecological Medicine. It exposed that the UK ‘government’ ” . . . made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations from both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence . . .” The same is true in the UNITED STATES.
2) THE VACCINE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUITS
In 1986 vaccine manufactures and administers were given immunity from liability with the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act! And, the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System was established. Annually, it reports about 11,000 serious vaccine reactions, including up to 200 deaths and many more permanent disabilities. But, poor reporting in America suggests that annual adverse vaccine reactions, in fact, number from 100,000 – one million.
Then to ‘seal the deal’, the US Supreme Court decided in 2011 (Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) to grant big pharma immunity from liability even if their products were knowingly contaminated.
[Originally posted on 3-25-13 on our sister site.]
As you all know, I am madly in love with your children. Their health and their future is of the utmost importance to me. In fact, there is nothing more important to me than their future well being.
That said, we need to talk.
As you all know your father and I have been closely involved in the medical profession for most of our adult lives. During the past 40 years we have observed – from front row seats – many changes in how medicine is practiced.
As a reminder, here is a brief synopsis of your father’s medical career:
Was a resident in internal medicine for 18 months
Completed a three year residency in anatomic pathology
Taught pathology at a medical school in West Virginia for seven years
Did a residency in general practice, passed the necessary exam and became a Board Certified physician in Family Medicine
Worked for the OSU urgent care clinic system for fourteen years
Took many many hours of continuing medical education
And here is mine:
I started my medical career as a hospital billing clerk. Then I was trained at Northwestern University in Chicago in Respiratory Therapy, did an internship-period at the University of Chicago, passed both a written and an oral exam to become a Registered Respiratory Therapist, was a supervisor in a hospital RT dept, and taught both advanced and basic life support to medical students. My last job in the profession was as a secretary for your father.
Your father and I have had many discussions regarding the medical profession over the years, as you know. It is safe to say that both of us were well trained and indoctrinated in the ‘field of medicine’ which has now become an ‘industry’. In fact some brave physicians have gone public regarding the changes that have occurred in the field of medicine over the past several decades: Doctors Speak out: healthcare has been reduced to a money making factory
Following is an analysis of some of the opinions expressed by BAR attorney Alan Phillips on December 22, 2015 in an invitation-only internet vaccination discussion forum with a large membership (over 100 members). Mr. Phillips expressed his opinion as to what topics the members of this discussion forum should be allowed to post and what they should not be allowed to post. Unfortunately the moderator of this discussion forum decided to accept Phillips’ definitions. I was removed for posting a piece exposing that physicians are being called upon to report on patient’s public health status (which would include vaccination history) called Deputizing Doctors
My primary concern is not my removal from the discussion forum, but the extremely important information that is being censored by the influence of gatekeeper BAR attorney Phillips. By controlling the discussion, Phillips can ensure the elephants in the room are never acknowledged or explored. The physicians, non-profit directors, researchers and journalists in the forum are then kept in the dark as to the vaccination agenda and how it is being executed across the country. Without this knowledge, they will be powerless to help stop it.
Please note: Alan Phillips has claimed to be the leading legal expert in the country regarding vaccines and ‘the law’. Many do not concur with his self assessment. Below are a few of gate keeper Phillips comments followed by my analysis – which includes bona fide sources.
Alliance for Vaccine Awareness [invitation only internet discussion forum]
Disinformation: Critical Scrutiny is Necessary
Posted by Alan Phillips Tuesday at 1:52pm [December 22, 2015]
There are only 2 legitimate vaccine discussion areas: 1) medical (do they work, are they effective, are they necessary, are there viable alternatives, etc.), and 2) legal (when are they mandatory, do you have the right to refuse, how do we change laws to get those rights, etc.). Issues of corruption, politics, etc. fall under these two headings–the use of false science to control policy and law, our rights.
When we allow our focus to be pulled away from these topics, big pharma pushes forward with its legislative agenda unopposed. WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE ROAD IS IN THE STATE LEGISLATURES, as the fed govt lacks authority to mandate vaccines directly. There are definitely fed law issues, but the primary focus must be on the state law level.
But I respectfully request that the owner or manager of this . . . project delete any discussions not pertinent to vaccine medicine and law, . . .
Let’s look at the important issues outside of gatekeeper Phillips’ definitions: vaccine science and state statutory law.
In the vaccine-aware movement, there seems to be four roadblocks that health advocates have not been able to overcome: government corporations, attorneys, physicians and non-profit organizations. As the vaccine promoters and beneficiaries escalate their efforts, we cannot afford to be ‘politically correct’ nor can we afford to be protective of anyone’s income. Our lives and the lives of our progeny are now at stake!
Is it government that serves the best interests of the people – NO
Is it a network of for-profit corporations [listed on Dun & Bradstreet & using private script – the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE] – YES
Do government corporations like the HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF (headquartered in WASHINGTON DC) hold vaccine patents – YES
Is it ever to likely serve the best interest of the public? – NO, it is not set up for that purpose, no matter what their employees say.
Who writes the corporate statutes that our uneducated legislators pass? Who falsely tells the people that these rules are laws that they are obligated to adhere to? Where are the contracts that the people signed agreeing to adhere to corporate statutes?
Do these attorneys represent the best interests of the people, including their clients – NO
Do most care that the general population is being harmed and enslaved in this process – NO
Since most have a basic understanding of the corporate model, do they investigate and/or expose the fact that the CDC is a for-profit corporation – NO
Do any so-called Constitutional attorneys tell the people that today all forms of government are just corporations and our courts are statutory-maritime? – NO [See: 28 U.S. Code § 3002 (15)]
Does this commercial-contractual construct called “government” provide income for attorneys? – YES
[Before reading the following exposé, please read this well written explanation regarding the origin and nature of BAR Esquire attorneys. Hint, they are not what most people think they are. The Legal Craft]
On November 10, 2015 BAR Esquire Mike Donnelly of the HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION (HSLDA) posted an article (Is Government Data Being Used to Deliver drug Company Profits) on their web site regarding letters sent to parents by the Indiana and Michigan health departments. The Michigan form letter was about their statewide vaccination database called the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR). It was addressed to “Parent or Guardian” (a UCC legal term meaning legal fiction “person”). It was originally personalized with a MCIR ID#, the date of birth, and age of the child. The letter also stated that their child “may be due” for specific vaccines based on MCIR records. The Michigan dept of Health & Human Services’ letter provided a list of “What you have to do”, which included: 1) make a doctor’s appointment, 2) give the doctor the MCIR notice, and 3) request the doctor’s office update the MCIR vaccination records. The letter did not contain the word require, nor did it site any state code, rule or regulation. You don’t have to be BAR Esquire to make these observations.
For many years the HSLDA has sold its unsuspecting membership the notion that this massive Washington, DC based non-profit corporation advocates for moms and dads who wisely choose to home school their sons and daughters. Membership in this non-profit corporation is $120 a year. They claim to have a membership of 84,000, therefore their admitted annual income exceeds $10, 080,00 a year and supports 9 BAR Esquires included in a staff of 100.
To preserve and advance the fundamental, God-given, constitutional right of parents and others legally responsible for their children to direct their education. We advocate for these freedoms in the courtrooms, before government officials, and in the public arena.
While their mission statement sounds good like all mission statements, it is based on keeping the “constitutional rights” myth alive for the purpose of fleecing the ill informed.
Earlier this year (July 7) Constitutional and Administrative attorney Jonathon Emord told the truth regarding agency rules and regulations and the US Constitution on a Coast to Coast radio broadcast. Here is a short clip from that interview:
Mr. Emord accurately stated that since the 1930’s administrative agencies have been increasingly dismantling our so-called “Constitutional” rights. Unfortunately he did not mention the reasons: 1) the well documented permanent state of national emergency (responsible for the creation of the massive administrative arm of our so-called government) which originated in 1933 and 2) the implementation of the Uniform Commercial Code (statutory law) which occurred in the 50’s and 60’s.
While BAR Esquire Donnelly’s article reflected his objection to government data collection efforts being used to promote pharmaceutical products, he totally misinformed HSLDA members. He stated that the letter “ordered parents to make an appointment to have their children immunized”, which it did not. Donnelly also did not let them know that the letter created no obligation for them to take any action whatsoever. Again it does not contain the word require and absolutely no code, rule or regulation is even sited.
As an advocate for lawful government, here is what I would do with this letter:
. . . and here’s what I would do with my Home School Legal Defense Association membership: Lesson: Never presume that Esquires are experts in the law!
On June 30, 2015 California’s governor Brown signed SB 277, that was recently passed by both the California House of Representatives and Senate. This new STATE OF CALIFORNIA statute closed the door on non-medical exemptions to state mandated school vaccinations.
There have been many responses to this travesty, unsurprisingly. The parents who have unquestioningly accepted the falsehoods spewing out of Big Pharma and the CDC (exposed by a Harvard Study) are relieved for they naively believe this change will serve to protect their own children. Those who understand the reality regarding vaccines are appropriately stunned and frightened.
Proposals to overcome the loss of protective exemptions are varied. Here are the most prevalent so far:
Leave the state
Find a doctor willing to sign a medical exemption
Write your own religious exemption citing the first amendment of the Constitution
Support a referendum: take the vaccine exemption issue to the general public in hopes over overriding the legislative decision
File a lawsuit
Home school your children
Submit a legal notice
Perhaps the vaccine-aware population needs to take a close look at these proposals before they put their time, money or hope into them.
The following video is polluted with vicious lies and disinformation about vaccines, the CDC and the honorable Dr Andrew Wakefield.
The true story of Dr Wakefield’s exceptional integrity and the vicious destruction of his career was explained by former CDC/EPA employee Dr David Lewis – who did his own thorough investigation of the entire tragic episode and explained his findings on Roger Landry’s show, The Liberty Beacon. Now only did Dr Lewis validate Dr Wakefield’s innocence, he exposed exactly how Wakefield was framed.
Some of the articles or pieces posted on this site contain copyrighted material. Credit is given to the author and links are provided to the original source. AntiCorruption Society makes this information available to advance public education. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use the copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.