Category Archives: vaccine

So, you’ve signed the Refusal to Vaccinate document?

Refusal to Vaccinate form header - sm 2

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

 

Perhaps you missed DO NOT SIGN the “Refusal to Vaccinate” Form and unwittingly signed the form!

What to do next?

Start by asking for the original back. Tell the doctor (or whoever) that your “family” decided for many reasons (we came up with 12) that it was not good to have it in your (or your child’s) file. It is best not to offer any more information than that or engage in any discussion, but to remain firm but pleasant. When it comes to vaccines, anything you tell them can be used against you, believe it or not!

The doctors have been warned that if they don’t have this form on file, the parent could sue the doctor should the child get one of the diseases the vaccine was ‘supposed’ to prevent. The lawyers for the vaccine agenda have pitted the doctors against the health and safety of their patients. Sad, huh? We have proof of this because we’ve read the instruction page that accompanied the Refusal to Vaccinate form that was given to physicians, et al.

If the doctor’s office does not cooperate, you will have to send them a certified letter “rescinding your signature” thus nullifying the form. It is also recommended that you send them a Vaccination Notice to end all disputes regarding vaccines.

Here is a sample letter reflecting what I would write:

Dear Doctor Bloohoo,

Unfortunately, I mistakenly signed the Refusal to Vaccinate form regarding my son (or daughter) that your office asked me to sign. After discussion with my family, I have decided that this form was not in our best interest to sign and have placed in my son’s (or daughter’s) file.

I hereby rescind my signature on that form making it null and void and require that your office return the original to me.

I (we) have concluded, after much research, that vaccinations today are neither safe nor effective and that the theory of “herd immunity” has been scientifically proven invalid many times.  So I am sending you my (our) own Vaccination Notice. Please include this notice in my son’s (or daughter’s) medical record.

Appreciatively,

Jane Doe (Mother of Sally Doe)
125 Maple Canyon
Canton, Ohio

Enclosed: Vaccination Notice


The Vaccination Notice with instructions can be found in the Overcoming Vaccine Mania Guide.

Advertisements

Beware of vaccine bullies!

Michelle Malkin, Townhall.comMalkin
2/4/2004

Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B — a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a half months ago.

We didn’t get very good answers. It was “convenient,” “recommended” and “routine,” the medical staff assured us. We wanted more information. A nurse gave us a brochure, which explained that babies whose mothers had the Hep B virus were at high risk of developing acute Hep B infections. Well, I tested negative for Hep B. The Centers for Disease Control named unprotected sex, IV drug use and being stuck with a needle on the job as the likeliest routes of Hep B transmission. Well, my husband and I both work primarily from home, our two children stay at home, and neither we nor our 3-year-old daughter nor our baby (for heaven’s sake!) live the Kid Rock-and-Pamela Anderson Lee lifestyle.

When we told the hospital staff that we simply wanted more time to think about giving the Hep B shot to our son — doesn’t “informed consent” mean we should be truly informed? — we were badgered aggressively. Some lectured us about the need to “get on the proper vaccination schedule.” Others warned that Maryland, like more than 40 other states, requires all schoolchildren to be vaccinated for Hep B. Teachers, however, are not subject to the mandate, which is driven not just by altruistic concern for children’s health. Ohio legislator Dale Van Vyven snuck the Hep B mandate into a 1998 hazardous-waste bill at the behest of profit-maximizing vaccine manufacturers’ lobbyists.

Continue reading

“Limited hangout” in vaccine aware movement?

By AL Whitney © copyround 2014
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

As thCDC - NOreat of an ebola false flag campaign looms over our country, we can no longer afford to be politically correct. Nor can we afford to tell half truths. The growing Center for Disease Control (CDC) ebola campaign (which resembles the H1N1 campaign of 2009) could have very serious consequences for the American population. So, we have to understand the extreme importance – right now – of discrediting the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Disclaimer: I have never met or communicated with Barbara Loe Fisher, therefore I have absolutely no personal grudge against either her or her organization, National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). As Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines neither solicits nor accepts donations or grants, we are not in competition with NVIC for funding either.

Limited hangout” is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details; to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when ones own sympathies are privately with them; or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous.”

This is a common tactic used by politicians as well as government intelligence agencies caught in scandals.

NVIC founder, Barbara Loe Fisher’s piece on another CDC whistleblower, Dr Thompson, fits the description of limited hangout . . . perfectly.

Here is the real story as brilliantly and bravely told by Dr Andrew Wakefield:
CDC Whistleblower

Wakefield’s video proves CDC’s awareness of vaccines causing autism as well as a history of the CDC intentionally causing harm and injury.

Here is Barbara Loe Fisher’s limited hangout coverage of the same story:        Remove Vaccine Safety Oversight from DHHS


Barbara accused the CDC of “withholding pertinent information” and having “conflicts of interest”. She doesn’t even mention the whistleblower’s name, so people could search out the details of the real story on their own.  And then, she moves the guilt away from the CDC and onto the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), which was never even mentioned by the whistleblower.  Barbara finishes her message by recommending contacting Congress. How many times will folks repeat the same strategy  expecting different results? In 2007 an investigation conducted by Senator Tom Coburn exposed the fact that the CDC functions exactly like a for-profit corporation: Report – CDC Off Center.  Nothing has changed ergo, contacting Congress simply won’t work, as the CDC is not under Congressional control. In fact, former EPA-CDC whistleblower and author Dr David Lewis exposed in a recent interview that both the EPA and the CDC are under the control of the White House. Short audio clip of that interview

THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST! To call what is going on at the CDC or the DHHS as “conflict of interests” is another example of . . . limited hangout!

Here Barbara describes the role of the DHHS:

barbara loe fisher

The DHHS is not a credible health advocacy organization. Both the DHHS and the CDC are quite the opposite.  They are for-profit corporations listed on Dun and Bradstreet. Their mission is to aggressively promote policies and products to universities, physicians and the media, that can be extremely harmful to human health – as whistleblowers Dr David Lewis and Dr William Thompson have courageously exposed. These faux agencies must be aggressively discredited. The public needs to understand that they are dangerous for-profit corporations that were never intended to protect the public’s health.  Recently independent researchers Alfred Lambremont Webre and Steve Green have exposed the CDC’s connection to the CIA: CDC and CIA – a close and sick relationship. By the way, Fisher lives in Sterling, VIRGINIA just 16 miles from the CIA’s Langley, VIRGINA operation.

NVIC also sent a ‘limited hangout’ propaganda booklet,  Reforming Vaccine Policy & Law – a Guide, to state legislators across America. It was extremely misleading. NVIC did not criticize the false theory of “herd immunity” upon which mandatory vaccination requirements are predicated.  She actually promoted the CDC’s position. Here is a page from that booklet:

herd immunity - NVIC

What the uninformed legislators really needed was to be educated about the CDC’s complete lack of credibility.  NVIC certainly could have sent the legislators information about the extremely long list of corruption that hangs over their institution (corporation) . . . but they did not.

No one should forget that it was Barbara Loe Fisher who helped Big Pharma shed liability for the harm their vaccine products cause by helping to get the  Vaccination Injury Compensation Act passed in 1986.

Police state registry system being set up to track your vaccination status

By Jeffry John Aufderheide, VacTruth.com
Apr 26th, 2013

CDC Pilot Vac and Info FlowThe Centers for Disease Control has been quietly rolling out a nationwide program called the Immunization Information Systems (IIS), registering your vaccine information into a database. [1] This effort has been run in parallel with state vaccine registry implementations.

What is the intention of such programs?

My colleague Leslie Manookian, writer and director of the movie The Greater Good, wrote in a recent article, the “CDC has openly stated that vaccine registries are a tool to identify areas of ‘undervaccination’ so that they can be ‘addressed’ and brought into ‘compliance.’” [2]

http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/vaccine-registries-whats-all-the-fuss/

I would also add to Leslie’s statement that since the government purchases a large bulk of the vaccines (for example, the Vaccines for Children program), it is in their financial interest to make sure vaccines are consumed regularly.

If you exempt your child from being vaccinated, your refusal is also being tracked and put into the database. If you want to know why this is a big deal, read on.

But first, what does tracking every vaccine you or your children have ever been injected with look like?

Big Plans for You

I want to make this very real for you.

The government collects information on who vaccinates their children and who does not. They know how many children have had their vaccines. They also know how many children have opted out of being vaccinated. They have the data.

The government has big plans and the most outrageous part about this entire scheme is you don’t have a choice – your data is entered. In order to accomplish this task we have to answer 3 basic questions.

1. What data is being tracked?

2. Who has access to the tracked data?

3. What will be done with this data?

Let’s start with the first question of what is being tracked.

Continue reading

Judge tosses out three religious exemption claims

Child of Practicing Catholic Denied Religious Exemption for School Vaccinations

By Frank Donnelly, Staten Island Live.com
June 16, 2014

vaccines - children runningSTATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — A Brooklyn federal court judge recently dismissed the lawsuit of a practicing Roman Catholic who objected, on religious grounds to the mandatory immunization of her young daughter for school.

In court papers, Dina Check, 47, of West Brighton, said she believes the body is a temple, and injecting vaccines into it “would defile God’s creation of the immune system … (and) demonstrate a lack of faith in God, which would anger God and therefore be sacrilegious.”

The state Public Health Law requires that children be vaccinated against a number of diseases, including mumps, measles, polio, diphtheria and rubella.

Ms. Check’s other children were vaccinated; however, she said she regretted doing so and had since turned to holistic medicine.

District Judge William F. Kuntz II tossed out Ms. Check’s lawsuit and the suits of two other plaintiffs who made similar claims.

In striking down Ms. Check’s claim, Kuntz said the U.S. Supreme Court has “strongly suggested” that religious objectors “are not constitutionally exempt from vaccinations” and that courts in the jurisdiction have “resolutely found there is no such constitutional exemption.”

Continue reading

Health Hazards of Disease Prevention

BSEM March 2011
(British Society of Ecological Medicine)

vaccines - children runningThe vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?

Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD

Neural Dynamics Research Group, Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, 828 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, lucijat77@gmail.com

INTRODUCTION

No pharmaceutical drug is devoid of risks from adverse reactions and vaccines are no exception. According to the world’s leading drug regulatory authority, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines represent a special category of drugs in that they are generally given to healthy individuals and often to prevent a disease to which an individual may never be exposed [1]. This, according to the FDA, places extra emphasis on vaccine safety. Universally, regulatory authorities are responsible for ensuring that new vaccines go through proper scientific evaluation before they are approved. An equal responsibility rests on the medical profession to promote vaccinations but only with those vaccines whose safety and efficacy has been demonstrated to be statistically significant. Furthermore, vaccination is a medical intervention and as such, it should be carried out with the full consent of those who are being subjected to it. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable risks and benefits and, where applicable, a description of alternative courses of treatment. In cases where children and infants are involved, full consent with regards to vaccination should be given by the parents.

Deliberately concealing information from the parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could thus be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.

Continue reading