AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION IS WORTH A POUND OF CURE!
By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.
More and more stories are coming in from parents across the country regarding the unlawful kidnapping of their children. Parents who wisely refuse to subject their children to the ever growing number of toxic and dangerous vaccines are not the only parents being victimized. Because their so-called ‘agency’ requires that they investigate all complaints – reasonable or not – employees for Children’s Protective Services (CPS) can show up on anyone’s door step. So, all parents need to be prepared to respond defensively.
If you are unaware of the magnitude of this problem, please go to the website of former CPS employee Carlos Morales: Truthovercomfort.net. As a former CASA volunteer with several years of experience in my own county, I concur with Mr Morales’s observations and conclusions about these dysfunctional and often dangerous so-called “child protection” agencies. You can listen to an interview Mr. Morales did on Red Ice Radio: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/11/RIR-141126.php
All CPS employees are bound by the rules and regulations (codes) of the STATE in which they are employed. So, one of the first things to be understood is why the so-called presumed authority of the STATE OF over our children is not valid – without our consent.
The STATE OF’s vast network of employees and their courts have been told that our son and daughters are indeed their property as in ‘under their jurisdiction’. To enforce their codes, they must provide proof of this claim, if requested. Without asking them for proof of their claim, it is presumed we accept it as fact. [See Who Owns Our Children] The only so called proof they have is the birth certificate signed by the child’s Mother. However, the Mother was never told that by signing the birth certificate she was donating her baby to the STATE OF. Contracts with undisclosed terms and conditions are not lawful and cannot be enforced . . . without your consent. What do you think the likelihood is of them admitting in writing that your signature on your baby’s birth certificate – that you were coerced into signing – meant that you were willingly with full knowledge and understanding donating your baby to the STATE? And, if you indeed did agree to care for the STATE’s property, as you have been doing, where are your payments for the many hours and costs you have invested?