Tag Archives: Prince vs Massachusetts

We cannot let the STATE inoculate our children without our knowledge or consent!

. . . WHICH GOVERNOR BROWN AUTHORIZED IN CALIFORNIA BY SIGNING AB499 IN 2011!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net  is acknowledged.

gardasil vialThe passage of Assembly Bill 499 in California should have been a wake up call for all parents. It essentially eliminated the parent’s authority when it comes to the administration of some vaccines. It grants the STATE (school) permission to vaccinate 12 year old boys and girls with the dangerous HPV vaccine without their moms and dads knowledge or consent.

While there will be some activists who continue to beat the freedom of religion and parental rights drums, these arguments were defeated way back in 1944 with the Supreme Court decision Prince vs Massachusetts and the doctrine of Parens Patriae. The Center for Disease Control knows this and posts it on their web site. (Chapter 13, page 273)

”Neither rights of religion nor rights of parenthood are beyond limitation. Acting to guard the general interest in youth’s well being, the state as parens patriae may restrict the parent’s control by requiring school attendance, regulating or prohibiting the child’s labor, and in many other ways. Its authority is not nullified merely because the parent grounds his claim to control the child’s course of conduct on religion or conscience.

Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious  grounds. The right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death. (321 U.S. at 166–7, 64 S.Ct. at 442)”

I have no idea why the vaccine-aware non-profits and vaccine rights attorneys ignore Prince vs. Massachusetts! Are they intentionally misleading the public?

As it is likely that other states will go down the same path as California due to the Healthy People 2020 program of the UNITED STATES’ (federal corporation – see Title 28 US Code, section 3002) Department of Health and Human Services, this action in California should inspire all parents to think about who should decide if their children receive inoculations, i.e. who owns our children . . . legally?

There is no way to answer that question from inside the Matrix that we have been stuck in our entire lives. Those unwilling to face our Matrix reality are dooming themselves and their sons and daughters to much heartache and suffering because the vaccination agenda is not going away anytime soon, as Dr. Sheri Tenpenny explained eloquently on Red Ice Radio.

So dear Matrix people, will it be the blue pill or the red pill?

Continue reading

Advertisements